Chilean vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,644,089 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 49.2 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 8.7%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $83,607, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $59,535, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $51,827, a difference of 2.6%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $54,721, a difference of 4.1%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $45,940, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.64%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.30%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.4%).