Chilean vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 246,979,169 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to a decrease of 33.0 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 13.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $90,372, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $97,284, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $40,257, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($48,504 compared to $46,564, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $50,609, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.3%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.8%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.51%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 26.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.8%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%).