Chilean vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,953,410 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.137% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 136.9 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $39,558, a difference of 17.4%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $49,711, a difference of 14.6%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $79,509, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,000, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $60,748, a difference of 5.3%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $38,202, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 31.0%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 74.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 63.5%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 58.1%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 24.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (47.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 75.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 4.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 49.4%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.7% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (89.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 129.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.1%).