Chilean vs Yuman Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yuman
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Yuman

Excellent
Tragic
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
959
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
331st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yuman Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,715,702 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yuman within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Yuman. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Yuman.
Chilean Integration in Yuman Communities

Chilean vs Yuman Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $33,236, a difference of 39.8%), median family income ($108,429 compared to $78,055, a difference of 38.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $72,956, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $50,933, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $35,377, a difference of 15.2%).
Chilean vs Yuman Income
Income MetricChileanYuman
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Tragic
$33,236
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$78,055
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Tragic
$68,743
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Tragic
$39,523
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Tragic
$45,446
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Tragic
$35,377
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Tragic
$50,933
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Tragic
$72,956
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Tragic
$82,139
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Tragic
$53,110
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
23.3%

Chilean vs Yuman Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 104.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 96.9%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 25.4%).
Chilean vs Yuman Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanYuman
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
20.2%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
16.6%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
19.5%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
24.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
28.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
30.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
27.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
21.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
29.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
37.8%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Tragic
9.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
20.2%

Chilean vs Yuman Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 285.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 120.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 113.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.5%).
Chilean vs Yuman Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanYuman
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
37.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
11.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
9.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
9.8%

Chilean vs Yuman Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 29.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 9.3%).
Chilean vs Yuman Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanYuman
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
57.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
71.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Tragic
27.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
70.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
76.3%

Chilean vs Yuman Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 57.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 48.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.8%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households (65.2% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.4%).
Chilean vs Yuman Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanYuman
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.47
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
44.4%

Chilean vs Yuman Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 50.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Chilean vs Yuman Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanYuman
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
14.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Tragic
85.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Tragic
51.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Good
6.5%

Chilean vs Yuman Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 83.4%), bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 67.8%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%).
Chilean vs Yuman Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanYuman
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
92.0%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
89.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Tragic
86.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
84.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
79.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
55.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
48.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
31.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Chilean vs Yuman Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 67.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 54.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.7%).
Chilean vs Yuman Disability
Disability MetricChileanYuman
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
31.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
54.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%