Chilean vs Okinawan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Okinawans

Excellent
Excellent
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Okinawan Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,714,316 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Okinawans within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.860. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Okinawans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 76.3 Okinawans.
Chilean Integration in Okinawan Communities

Chilean vs Okinawan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $55,817, a difference of 20.1%), median family income ($108,429 compared to $129,979, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $119,349, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,701, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $70,846, a difference of 10.8%).
Chilean vs Okinawan Income
Income MetricChileanOkinawan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Exceptional
$55,817
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Exceptional
$129,979
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Exceptional
$106,624
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Exceptional
$57,550
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Exceptional
$67,232
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Exceptional
$46,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Exceptional
$54,701
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Exceptional
$119,349
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Exceptional
$124,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Exceptional
$70,846
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
28.1%

Chilean vs Okinawan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 23.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.78%), poverty (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Chilean vs Okinawan Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanOkinawan
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
8.9%

Chilean vs Okinawan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.35%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.90%).
Chilean vs Okinawan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanOkinawan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%

Chilean vs Okinawan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.59%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Chilean vs Okinawan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanOkinawan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Good
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Good
83.0%

Chilean vs Okinawan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.6%).
Chilean vs Okinawan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanOkinawan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
62.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Exceptional
26.9%

Chilean vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 12.9%).
Chilean vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanOkinawan
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Tragic
86.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Tragic
51.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.5%

Chilean vs Okinawan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 52.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 39.2%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
Chilean vs Okinawan Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanOkinawan
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Exceptional
73.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Exceptional
69.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
57.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Exceptional
50.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
22.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
3.3%

Chilean vs Okinawan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.3%).
Chilean vs Okinawan Disability
Disability MetricChileanOkinawan
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
20.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%