Chilean vs Japanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Japanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Japanese

Excellent
Fair
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Japanese Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,235,202 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Japanese.
Chilean Integration in Japanese Communities

Chilean vs Japanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $39,870, a difference of 16.5%), median family income ($108,429 compared to $97,288, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $51,473, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $52,365, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $38,528, a difference of 5.8%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $44,825, a difference of 8.2%).
Chilean vs Japanese Income
Income MetricChileanJapanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Tragic
$39,870
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$97,288
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Fair
$83,395
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Tragic
$44,825
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Tragic
$51,473
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Tragic
$38,528
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Good
$52,365
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Poor
$91,624
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Poor
$96,834
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Tragic
$57,919
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
23.8%

Chilean vs Japanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Chilean vs Japanese Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanJapanese
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
14.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Poor
18.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
14.1%

Chilean vs Japanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.0%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Chilean vs Japanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanJapanese
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%

Chilean vs Japanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.76%).
Chilean vs Japanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanJapanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
81.6%

Chilean vs Japanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.020%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.7%).
Chilean vs Japanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanJapanese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
29.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.35
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
35.2%

Chilean vs Japanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Chilean vs Japanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanJapanese
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Exceptional
90.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.7%

Chilean vs Japanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 48.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Chilean vs Japanese Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanJapanese
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.6%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.4%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
95.7%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
89.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Tragic
88.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
85.9%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
82.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
61.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
55.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
41.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
33.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Chilean vs Japanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.1%).
Chilean vs Japanese Disability
Disability MetricChileanJapanese
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%