Chilean vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Luxembourgers

Excellent
Excellent
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,121,515 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.575. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 65.3 Luxembourgers.
Chilean Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Chilean vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $60,967, a difference of 4.9%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $86,418, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $56,300, a difference of 1.2%), per capita income ($46,459 compared to $45,663, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $47,640, a difference of 1.8%).
Chilean vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricChileanLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.4%

Chilean vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 27.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.3%), single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Chilean vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanLuxembourger
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.1%

Chilean vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 16.6%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chilean vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanLuxembourger
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%

Chilean vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Chilean vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
85.0%

Chilean vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.2%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.69%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (65.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Chilean vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Exceptional
29.4%

Chilean vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 84.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Chilean vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Chilean vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
Chilean vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
1.9%

Chilean vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Chilean vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricChileanLuxembourger
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%