Chilean vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,032,078 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 18.6 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $49,862, a difference of 7.3%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $60,117, a difference of 5.5%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $112,665, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,154, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $65,246, a difference of 2.0%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.41%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.11%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.7%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.59%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.5%).