Chilean vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,149,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.163% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 163.2 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $39,826, a difference of 16.7%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $51,389, a difference of 10.9%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $44,206, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $65,427, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,610, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 44.1%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 51.4%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.3%).