Chilean vs Shoshone Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Shoshone
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Shoshone
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Shoshone Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,328,316 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.819. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.370% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 370.2 Shoshone.
Chilean vs Shoshone Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $83,588, a difference of 27.5%), per capita income ($46,459 compared to $37,072, a difference of 25.3%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $72,660, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $48,720, a difference of 9.2%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $34,677, a difference of 17.5%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Shoshone |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $37,072 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Tragic $87,872 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Tragic $72,660 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $40,932 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $47,930 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $34,677 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $48,720 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Tragic $82,062 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Tragic $83,588 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Tragic $53,681 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Good 25.4% |
Chilean vs Shoshone Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 45.9%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Shoshone |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 16.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 20.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 25.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Poor 12.4% |
Chilean vs Shoshone Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 83.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 12.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Shoshone |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Chilean vs Shoshone Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Shoshone |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 39.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 79.3% |
Chilean vs Shoshone Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.3%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Shoshone |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 43.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.37 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 35.3% |
Chilean vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 38.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Shoshone |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Fair 10.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Fair 89.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Chilean vs Shoshone Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 55.5%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Shoshone |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 38.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 29.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 11.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chilean vs Shoshone Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 41.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 40.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Shoshone |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 27.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 49.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |