Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Carpatho Rusyns

Excellent
Good
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,223,416 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.995. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.126% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 125.9 Carpatho Rusyns.
Chilean Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $49,113, a difference of 8.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $61,093, a difference of 4.7%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $86,635, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $40,825, a difference of 0.17%), median earnings ($48,504 compared to $48,617, a difference of 0.23%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $99,449, a difference of 0.45%).
Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Income
Income MetricChileanCarpatho Rusyn
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Exceptional
$47,248
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Exceptional
$107,502
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Good
$86,635
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Exceptional
$48,617
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Exceptional
$57,572
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Exceptional
$40,825
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Tragic
$49,113
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Exceptional
$99,449
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Good
$102,777
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Average
$61,093
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.3%

Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 25.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.090%), single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.73%).
Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanCarpatho Rusyn
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
21.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.4%

Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanCarpatho Rusyn
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Good
5.4%

Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.99%).
Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanCarpatho Rusyn
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
87.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.5%

Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 11.8%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and family households (65.2% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.13%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanCarpatho Rusyn
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
61.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.06
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Good
30.9%

Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.9%).
Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanCarpatho Rusyn
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Fair
10.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Tragic
18.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.5%

Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 48.7%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.28%), college, 1 year or more (62.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and college, under 1 year (67.6% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanCarpatho Rusyn
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
92.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
89.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Exceptional
67.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Exceptional
42.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
17.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%

Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Chilean vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability
Disability MetricChileanCarpatho Rusyn
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%