Chilean vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Soviet Union

Excellent
Good
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,878,220 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.734. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.350% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 350.4 Soviet Union.
Chilean Integration in Soviet Union Communities

Chilean vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $54,202, a difference of 16.7%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $46,556, a difference of 14.2%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $54,290, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $62,848, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $55,340, a difference of 4.1%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $95,098, a difference of 5.0%).
Chilean vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricChileanSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
24.2%

Chilean vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.89%), poverty (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Chilean vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanSoviet Union
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Good
11.1%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Excellent
11.1%

Chilean vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
Chilean vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanSoviet Union
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Chilean vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
Chilean vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Good
83.0%

Chilean vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 6.5%).
Chilean vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanSoviet Union
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Exceptional
26.3%

Chilean vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 76.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 44.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 38.9%).
Chilean vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
4.4%

Chilean vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.9%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
Chilean vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.5%

Chilean vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 35.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.62%).
Chilean vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricChileanSoviet Union
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
2.5%