Chilean vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,276,650 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.802. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.134% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 134.2 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $76,903, a difference of 38.6%), median family income ($108,429 compared to $79,563, a difference of 36.3%), and per capita income ($46,459 compared to $34,578, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,907, a difference of 11.0%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $33,894, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 66.2%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 56.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.8%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 124.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 74.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 90.2%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 66.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (65.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.6%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 69.6%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 66.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 79.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 55.2%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.0%).