Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Immigrants from the Azores

Excellent
Poor
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,974,421 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.215% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 214.6 Immigrants from the Azores.
Chilean Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $52,121, a difference of 22.7%), per capita income ($46,459 compared to $39,608, a difference of 17.3%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $95,402, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $52,621, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $38,573, a difference of 5.7%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Income
Income MetricChileanImmigrants from the Azores
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Tragic
$39,608
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$95,402
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Tragic
$80,357
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Fair
$45,812
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Fair
$53,503
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Good
$52,621
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Fair
$92,322
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Tragic
$94,138
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Tragic
$52,121
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.2%

Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 49.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and female poverty (12.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 10.5%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanImmigrants from the Azores
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
32.2%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
15.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
16.4%

Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.1%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanImmigrants from the Azores
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%

Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.0%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanImmigrants from the Azores
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
80.1%

Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 29.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.65%), and family households (65.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.74%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanImmigrants from the Azores
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
45.1%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
39.6%

Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.28%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanImmigrants from the Azores
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Excellent
56.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.5%

Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 86.0%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 65.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanImmigrants from the Azores
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
95.1%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
94.7%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
93.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Tragic
92.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
90.8%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
89.0%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
87.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Tragic
85.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
82.8%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
78.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
54.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
48.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
35.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
27.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.4%

Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 74.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 39.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.4%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability
Disability MetricChileanImmigrants from the Azores
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
50.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%