Chilean vs Serbian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Serbians

Excellent
Excellent
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Serbian Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,990,221 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 87.6 Serbians.
Chilean Integration in Serbian Communities

Chilean vs Serbian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $61,087, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $51,106, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,459 compared to $46,551, a difference of 0.20%), median earnings ($48,504 compared to $48,677, a difference of 0.36%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $40,539, a difference of 0.54%).
Chilean vs Serbian Income
Income MetricChileanSerbian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Exceptional
$46,551
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Exceptional
$107,157
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Excellent
$87,572
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Exceptional
$48,677
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Exceptional
$57,975
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Excellent
$40,539
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Tragic
$51,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Excellent
$98,320
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Excellent
$103,522
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Average
$61,087
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.7%

Chilean vs Serbian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Chilean vs Serbian Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanSerbian
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.3%

Chilean vs Serbian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.3%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Chilean vs Serbian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanSerbian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chilean vs Serbian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
Chilean vs Serbian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanSerbian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.4%

Chilean vs Serbian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.0%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.12, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 0.040%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chilean vs Serbian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanSerbian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Good
30.7%

Chilean vs Serbian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.8%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Chilean vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanSerbian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Poor
6.0%

Chilean vs Serbian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (67.6% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%).
Chilean vs Serbian Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanSerbian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Exceptional
67.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.0%

Chilean vs Serbian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Chilean vs Serbian Disability
Disability MetricChileanSerbian
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%