Chilean vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,973,770 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.101% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 100.7 Taiwanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $49,804, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $55,556, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,459 compared to $46,455, a difference of 0.010%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $40,576, a difference of 0.45%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $89,900, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 11.2%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.4%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.020%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%).