Chilean vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,417,264 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to a decrease of 80.9 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $118,056, a difference of 18.2%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $66,903, a difference of 17.4%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $56,183, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $57,123, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $69,872, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.54%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 22.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.23%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 37.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.9%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.10%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and high school diploma (89.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 25.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.67%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).