Chilean vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,296,991 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.949. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.124% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 123.6 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $74,815, a difference of 42.5%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $65,914, a difference of 37.5%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $80,885, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 11.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $44,733, a difference of 18.9%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $34,074, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 57.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 57.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 43.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.94%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 70.5%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 56.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 69.6%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 56.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 16.7%).