Chilean vs Bermudan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bermudan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Bermudans

Excellent
Fair
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,838
SOCIAL INDEX
25.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
241st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bermudan Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,587,718 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 14.7 Bermudans.
Chilean Integration in Bermudan Communities

Chilean vs Bermudan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 13.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $88,231, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $94,197, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $39,418, a difference of 3.4%), median earnings ($48,504 compared to $45,593, a difference of 6.4%), and per capita income ($46,459 compared to $42,911, a difference of 8.3%).
Chilean vs Bermudan Income
Income MetricChileanBermudan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Fair
$42,911
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$97,577
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Tragic
$80,406
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Fair
$45,593
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Poor
$52,465
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Fair
$39,418
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Tragic
$47,359
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Tragic
$88,231
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Tragic
$94,197
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Tragic
$58,171
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
23.1%

Chilean vs Bermudan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 23.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 6.0%).
Chilean vs Bermudan Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanBermudan
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
21.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%

Chilean vs Bermudan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Chilean vs Bermudan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanBermudan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%

Chilean vs Bermudan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.39%).
Chilean vs Bermudan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanBermudan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Excellent
83.1%

Chilean vs Bermudan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.8%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (65.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Chilean vs Bermudan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanBermudan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
42.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
35.5%

Chilean vs Bermudan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 29.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 10.9%).
Chilean vs Bermudan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanBermudan
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
12.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Tragic
87.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.6%

Chilean vs Bermudan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%).
Chilean vs Bermudan Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanBermudan
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Good
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Average
91.2%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Average
85.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Average
65.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Average
59.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Average
46.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Good
15.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
1.8%

Chilean vs Bermudan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%).
Chilean vs Bermudan Disability
Disability MetricChileanBermudan
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Excellent
46.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%