Chilean vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,566,501 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $72,178, a difference of 38.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $77,850, a difference of 36.9%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $66,768, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $34,317, a difference of 18.8%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $43,266, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 53.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 51.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.4%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 21.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (65.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.18%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 44.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.0%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.72%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.9%).