Chilean vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,647,842 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 7.2 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $33,921, a difference of 37.0%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $67,792, a difference of 33.7%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $82,386, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $46,417, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $35,063, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 87.5%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 86.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 79.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 32.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 37.0%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 39.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 90.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 80.4%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 50.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 38.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.25%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.52, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.6%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 58.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.53%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 7.1%).