Chilean vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Ute

Excellent
Fair
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,184,087 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 25.0 Ute.
Chilean Integration in Ute Communities

Chilean vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $83,937, a difference of 27.0%), per capita income ($46,459 compared to $36,651, a difference of 26.8%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $72,402, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $49,997, a difference of 6.4%), and median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $48,899, a difference of 16.5%).
Chilean vs Ute Income
Income MetricChileanUte
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.8%

Chilean vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (10.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 51.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 51.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.8%).
Chilean vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanUte
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
14.7%

Chilean vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.6%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.3%).
Chilean vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanUte
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%

Chilean vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.2%).
Chilean vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
76.6%

Chilean vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.7%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.49, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.060%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
Chilean vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanUte
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Poor
33.0%

Chilean vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.8%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.82%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.1%).
Chilean vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanUte
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
8.8%

Chilean vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.6%), bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and 8th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
Chilean vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanUte
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%

Chilean vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 48.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
Chilean vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricChileanUte
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
2.5%