Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,441,845 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.221% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 220.9 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $82,254, a difference of 21.4%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and per capita income ($46,459 compared to $39,529, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $37,965, a difference of 7.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $58,375, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,916, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 28.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.41%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.0%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.57%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.64%), and family households (65.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.34%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.0%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.4%).