Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Immigrants from Middle Africa

Excellent
Fair
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,441,845 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.221% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 220.9 Immigrants from Middle Africa.
Chilean Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities

Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $82,254, a difference of 21.4%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and per capita income ($46,459 compared to $39,529, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $37,965, a difference of 7.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $58,375, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,916, a difference of 11.0%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income
Income MetricChileanImmigrants from Middle Africa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Tragic
$39,529
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$93,593
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Tragic
$77,559
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Tragic
$43,416
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Tragic
$49,201
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Tragic
$37,965
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Tragic
$47,916
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Tragic
$82,254
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Tragic
$91,293
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Tragic
$58,375
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
22.4%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 28.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.41%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.7%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanImmigrants from Middle Africa
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
12.9%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanImmigrants from Middle Africa
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanImmigrants from Middle Africa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
67.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.3%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.0%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.57%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.64%), and family households (65.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.3%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanImmigrants from Middle Africa
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
34.9%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.34%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Good
89.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Tragic
53.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.0%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
94.2%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
92.9%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Poor
58.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Poor
44.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Fair
36.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
1.9%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability
Disability MetricChileanImmigrants from Middle Africa
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%