Chilean vs Navajo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Navajo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Navajo
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Navajo Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,711,063 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.101% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 101.2 Navajo.
Chilean vs Navajo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $29,031, a difference of 60.0%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $59,159, a difference of 53.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $69,759, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.6%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $33,046, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $42,380, a difference of 25.5%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Navajo |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $29,031 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Tragic $70,989 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Tragic $59,159 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $36,999 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $42,098 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $33,046 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $42,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Tragic $66,529 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Tragic $69,759 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Tragic $47,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Chilean vs Navajo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 139.8%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 122.4%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 112.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 44.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 53.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 56.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Navajo |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 22.3% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 23.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 30.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 31.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 30.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 30.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 31.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 29.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 40.2% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 19.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 21.1% |
Chilean vs Navajo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 112.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 103.2%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 94.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Navajo |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 29.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 8.2% |
Chilean vs Navajo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Navajo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 56.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 69.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Tragic 32.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 72.8% |
Chilean vs Navajo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 67.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.29%), family households (65.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Navajo |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 40.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.65 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.8% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 39.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 51.5% |
Chilean vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Navajo |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Exceptional 90.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chilean vs Navajo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 83.0%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 79.6%), and bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 74.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Navajo |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Tragic 92.3% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Tragic 90.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Tragic 87.1% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Tragic 85.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 81.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 56.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 50.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 32.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 23.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chilean vs Navajo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 61.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.6%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Navajo |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 33.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 58.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.6% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |