Chilean vs Yup'ik Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Yup'ik

Excellent
Fair
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yup'ik Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,438,436 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.973. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.175% in Yup'ik. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 174.6 Yup'ik.
Chilean Integration in Yup'ik Communities

Chilean vs Yup'ik Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $30,518, a difference of 52.2%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $39,504, a difference of 44.2%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $79,290, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,732, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $60,727, a difference of 5.3%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.6%).
Chilean vs Yup'ik Income
Income MetricChileanYup'ik
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Tragic
$30,518
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$79,290
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Tragic
$69,695
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Tragic
$35,942
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Tragic
$39,504
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Tragic
$32,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Exceptional
$54,732
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Tragic
$73,688
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Tragic
$81,000
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Average
$60,727
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
24.7%

Chilean vs Yup'ik Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 197.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 170.9%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 165.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 16.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.9%).
Chilean vs Yup'ik Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanYup'ik
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
24.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
25.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
24.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
25.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
26.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
32.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
32.5%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
32.7%

Chilean vs Yup'ik Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 255.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 228.8%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 225.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 51.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 78.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 80.0%).
Chilean vs Yup'ik Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanYup'ik
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
16.4%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
10.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
23.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
41.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
17.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
9.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
21.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
18.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
11.0%

Chilean vs Yup'ik Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 6.1%).
Chilean vs Yup'ik Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanYup'ik
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
62.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Tragic
33.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
70.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
73.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
78.6%

Chilean vs Yup'ik Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 142.9%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 84.0%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 63.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 7.8%), family households (65.2% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.3%).
Chilean vs Yup'ik Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanYup'ik
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
72.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
37.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
44.1%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
4.00
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
39.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
56.4%

Chilean vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 364.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 60.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 32.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 54.3%).
Chilean vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanYup'ik
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
45.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Tragic
58.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Tragic
34.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Tragic
14.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Chilean vs Yup'ik Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 112.1%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 98.2%), and associate's degree (49.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 98.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.0% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.22%), 10th grade (93.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.87%).
Chilean vs Yup'ik Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanYup'ik
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.2%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
99.2%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
99.2%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
99.2%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
99.2%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
99.0%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Tragic
87.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
86.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
45.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
39.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
25.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
19.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
8.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Chilean vs Yup'ik Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 253.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 103.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.77%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.9%).
Chilean vs Yup'ik Disability
Disability MetricChileanYup'ik
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
4.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
37.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
61.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%