Chilean vs Brazilian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Brazilians

Excellent
Good
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Brazilian Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,196,057 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to a decrease of 14.8 Brazilians.
Chilean Integration in Brazilian Communities

Chilean vs Brazilian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $61,465, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,335, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $104,408, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $56,837, a difference of 0.24%), median earnings ($48,504 compared to $48,356, a difference of 0.31%), and per capita income ($46,459 compared to $46,700, a difference of 0.52%).
Chilean vs Brazilian Income
Income MetricChileanBrazilian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Exceptional
$46,700
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Excellent
$106,942
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Exceptional
$88,934
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Exceptional
$48,356
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Exceptional
$56,837
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Excellent
$40,483
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Exceptional
$54,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Excellent
$98,267
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Excellent
$104,408
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Good
$61,465
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
26.7%

Chilean vs Brazilian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 5.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.22%), female poverty (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and poverty (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Chilean vs Brazilian Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanBrazilian
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Good
11.9%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Excellent
11.1%

Chilean vs Brazilian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chilean vs Brazilian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanBrazilian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Poor
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%

Chilean vs Brazilian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
Chilean vs Brazilian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanBrazilian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.7%

Chilean vs Brazilian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.56%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.96%).
Chilean vs Brazilian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanBrazilian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Average
6.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Excellent
30.4%

Chilean vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Chilean vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanBrazilian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.4%

Chilean vs Brazilian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.4%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and college, under 1 year (67.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).
Chilean vs Brazilian Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanBrazilian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Good
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%

Chilean vs Brazilian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.63%).
Chilean vs Brazilian Disability
Disability MetricChileanBrazilian
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%