Chilean vs Scottish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scottish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Scottish

Excellent
Good
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,834
SOCIAL INDEX
65.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
139th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scottish Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,440,983 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 7.3 Scottish.
Chilean Integration in Scottish Communities

Chilean vs Scottish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.8%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $85,101, a difference of 6.5%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $38,397, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $55,793, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $61,735, a difference of 3.6%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $104,288, a difference of 4.0%).
Chilean vs Scottish Income
Income MetricChileanScottish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Good
$44,440
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Good
$104,288
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Average
$85,101
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Average
$46,463
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Good
$55,793
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Tragic
$38,397
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Tragic
$50,554
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Average
$94,622
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Good
$102,123
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Good
$61,735
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
29.1%

Chilean vs Scottish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chilean vs Scottish Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanScottish
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
30.1%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.9%

Chilean vs Scottish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chilean vs Scottish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanScottish
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chilean vs Scottish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Chilean vs Scottish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanScottish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
42.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
82.2%

Chilean vs Scottish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.5%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Chilean vs Scottish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanScottish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Exceptional
49.0%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
49.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Average
31.7%

Chilean vs Scottish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 46.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 14.8%).
Chilean vs Scottish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanScottish
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Exceptional
93.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
61.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.4%

Chilean vs Scottish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 44.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.70%).
Chilean vs Scottish Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanScottish
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Exceptional
67.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Excellent
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Average
38.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.0%

Chilean vs Scottish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.55%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Chilean vs Scottish Disability
Disability MetricChileanScottish
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
2.5%