Chilean vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,533,233 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 10.9 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $34,886, a difference of 33.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $82,184, a difference of 29.7%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $84,451, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $49,395, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $34,895, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 81.1%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 81.0%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 20.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 91.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 71.4%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 29.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.46, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.2%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 54.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 48.3%), and bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 45.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.5%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 15.3%).