Chilean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,863,232 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.333. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 40.5 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $51,914, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $97,880, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($108,429 compared to $108,830, a difference of 0.37%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $63,643, a difference of 0.49%), and median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $57,352, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.7%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.49%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in family households (65.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.7%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.50%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.4%), bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.71%), female disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.99%).