Chilean vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,011,477 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.951. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.294% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 293.9 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $38,120, a difference of 21.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $88,115, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $75,839, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $49,364, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $56,339, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.66%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 62.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.4%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.4%).