Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Immigrants from Ecuador

Excellent
Poor
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,178,381 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 26.8 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Chilean Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $54,030, a difference of 18.4%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $92,837, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,722, a difference of 1.0%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $38,644, a difference of 5.5%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $44,462, a difference of 9.1%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricChileanImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
22.5%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 37.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 36.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.28%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
15.0%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.1%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.76%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
82.2%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.8%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.53%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
33.7%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 140.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 51.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 18.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 38.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.0%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
4.2%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 52.8%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.4%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricChileanImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%