Chilean vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,684,811 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to a decrease of 30.4 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $43,539, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $55,714, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $64,089, a difference of 0.21%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $100,283, a difference of 0.38%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $106,109, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 9.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.59%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.64%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.7%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.14%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.9%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.5%).