Chilean vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,535,421 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 85.8 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $90,137, a difference of 10.8%), and per capita income ($46,459 compared to $42,164, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $40,429, a difference of 0.81%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $52,594, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $46,440, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 27.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 25.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 5.3%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.8%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.0%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.94%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 66.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.2%).