Chilean vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,088,408 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $65,236, a difference of 14.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $121,444, a difference of 13.9%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $103,145, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,800, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $44,911, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.37%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.42%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.28%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.5%).