Chilean vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,314,930 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 11.2 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $74,224, a difference of 30.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $128,723, a difference of 28.8%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $138,397, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $57,740, a difference of 8.6%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $76,686, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 48.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 35.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.61%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 33.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.91%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 59.6%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 43.8%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.4%).