Chilean vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Czechs

Excellent
Excellent
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 241,064,553 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 77.1 Czechs.
Chilean Integration in Czech Communities

Chilean vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 11.0%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $86,164, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $38,992, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $56,546, a difference of 0.75%), median family income ($108,429 compared to $105,839, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $47,221, a difference of 2.7%).
Chilean vs Czech Income
Income MetricChileanCzech
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
29.2%

Chilean vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Chilean vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanCzech
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.2%

Chilean vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Chilean vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanCzech
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%

Chilean vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.65%).
Chilean vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.9%

Chilean vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.5%), currently married (47.0% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and family households (65.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chilean vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanCzech
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Excellent
30.5%

Chilean vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 43.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 14.3%).
Chilean vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanCzech
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.4%

Chilean vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.62%).
Chilean vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanCzech
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
1.9%

Chilean vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chilean vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricChileanCzech
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%