Chilean vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bangladeshi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Bangladeshis

Excellent
Fair
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,611
SOCIAL INDEX
23.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
249th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bangladeshi Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,473,466 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to a decrease of 11.2 Bangladeshis.
Chilean Integration in Bangladeshi Communities

Chilean vs Bangladeshi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $35,897, a difference of 29.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $86,402, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $81,363, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,589, a difference of 11.8%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $35,960, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $54,719, a difference of 16.9%).
Chilean vs Bangladeshi Income
Income MetricChileanBangladeshi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Tragic
$35,897
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$88,358
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Tragic
$74,112
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Tragic
$41,263
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Tragic
$46,744
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Tragic
$35,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Tragic
$47,589
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Tragic
$81,363
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Tragic
$86,402
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Tragic
$54,719
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
22.2%

Chilean vs Bangladeshi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 36.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 34.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.6%).
Chilean vs Bangladeshi Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanBangladeshi
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
16.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
20.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
24.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
31.7%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
15.0%

Chilean vs Bangladeshi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Chilean vs Bangladeshi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanBangladeshi
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%

Chilean vs Bangladeshi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.71%).
Chilean vs Bangladeshi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanBangladeshi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
42.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
81.3%

Chilean vs Bangladeshi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 38.6%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.3%).
Chilean vs Bangladeshi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanBangladeshi
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
30.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
34.4%

Chilean vs Bangladeshi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.0%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 11.0%).
Chilean vs Bangladeshi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanBangladeshi
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
58.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.6%

Chilean vs Bangladeshi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 77.7%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 73.5%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chilean vs Bangladeshi Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanBangladeshi
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.3%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
95.9%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Tragic
94.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
93.4%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Tragic
89.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
86.9%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
61.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
40.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.2%

Chilean vs Bangladeshi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 33.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.9%).
Chilean vs Bangladeshi Disability
Disability MetricChileanBangladeshi
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%