Chilean vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Yakama

Excellent
Poor
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,102,542 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.500. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.171% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 170.7 Yakama.
Chilean Integration in Yakama Communities

Chilean vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $33,009, a difference of 40.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $76,226, a difference of 31.1%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $83,932, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,321, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $56,234, a difference of 13.7%).
Chilean vs Yakama Income
Income MetricChileanYakama
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
23.7%

Chilean vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 95.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 81.2%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.4%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 30.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 32.5%).
Chilean vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanYakama
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
21.4%

Chilean vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 118.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 90.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 88.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.6%).
Chilean vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
8.1%

Chilean vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Chilean vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
80.6%

Chilean vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 88.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.9%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households (65.2% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.4%).
Chilean vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanYakama
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
40.3%

Chilean vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 102.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 57.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.6%).
Chilean vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanYakama
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
12.9%

Chilean vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 79.0%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 74.1%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chilean vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanYakama
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Chilean vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 42.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 37.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.6%).
Chilean vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricChileanYakama
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%