Chilean vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,843,608 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $42,084, a difference of 3.3%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $49,648, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,185, a difference of 0.0%), per capita income ($46,459 compared to $46,531, a difference of 0.15%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $108,161, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.8%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.1%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.21%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.20%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.45%).