Chilean vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,550,301 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 50.5 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $60,350, a difference of 5.9%), per capita income ($46,459 compared to $49,173, a difference of 5.8%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $114,553, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $52,540, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $65,326, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 13.0%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.42%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 9.9%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.99%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 32.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.2%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 8th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.25%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.0%).