Chilean vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Ecuadorians

Excellent
Poor
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,773,992 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to a decrease of 9.7 Ecuadorians.
Chilean Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Chilean vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $54,958, a difference of 16.4%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $95,114, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,911, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $39,117, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $45,214, a difference of 7.3%).
Chilean vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricChileanEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
22.9%

Chilean vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 35.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.090%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.1%).
Chilean vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanEcuadorian
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
14.9%

Chilean vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.8%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%).
Chilean vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanEcuadorian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%

Chilean vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.63%).
Chilean vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
82.3%

Chilean vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.4%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.30%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Chilean vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanEcuadorian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Poor
33.3%

Chilean vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 130.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 43.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 33.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.2%).
Chilean vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
4.5%

Chilean vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.5%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.8%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.97%).
Chilean vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Chilean vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Chilean vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricChileanEcuadorian
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%