Chilean vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,658,283 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $52,074, a difference of 12.1%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $62,857, a difference of 10.3%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $118,440, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,739, a difference of 1.0%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $66,891, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $43,308, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.7%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.080%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Australian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.0%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.35%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.16%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.2%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Australian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.050%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.66%).