Chilean vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,020,976 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.161% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 161.1 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $95,698, a difference of 4.4%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $87,553, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $40,739, a difference of 0.040%), median earnings ($48,504 compared to $48,041, a difference of 0.96%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $52,374, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.46%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.13%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.080%), 8th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.72%).