Arapaho vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,739,615 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.997. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 5.553% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 5,552.8 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $40,895, a difference of 29.9%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $41,476, a difference of 28.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $89,748, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $55,598, a difference of 6.8%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $93,988, a difference of 14.5%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $80,373, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 69.8%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 42.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 137.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 98.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 94.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.0%), births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 29.8%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 235.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 127.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 98.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 20.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 49.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 98.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 35.2%), and bachelor's degree (26.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.10%), college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 66.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 34.3%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.6%).