Arapaho vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,428,568 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Russians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 8.8 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $53,154, a difference of 64.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $110,398, a difference of 54.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $116,328, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $67,626, a difference of 13.9%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $54,389, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 75.9%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 69.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 165.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 138.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 131.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Russian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 68.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.7%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (66.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 57.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 56.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 40.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 120.2%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 118.7%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 95.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.080%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 32.8%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.6%).