Arapaho vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,248,755 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 74.9 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $44,595, a difference of 37.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $103,507, a difference of 36.3%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $56,546, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $61,244, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,421, a difference of 16.9%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $38,992, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czech communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 70.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 63.3%), and single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 15.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 155.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 150.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 149.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 54.3%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.0%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.11, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czech communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.58%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czech communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.8%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 52.1%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.5%).