Arapaho vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,692,170 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 19.1 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $54,599, a difference of 24.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $93,176, a difference of 22.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $86,913, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $58,226, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $92,545, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 74.6%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 60.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 134.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 120.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 114.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 29.3%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 0.78%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.49, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 84.2%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.5%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 40.9%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.4%).