Arapaho vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,909,898 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.660. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.132% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 131.7 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $119,496, a difference of 66.7%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $53,874, a difference of 66.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $122,343, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.7%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $70,238, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $58,239, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 94.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 71.9%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.25%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 202.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 149.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 145.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 86.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.3%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.24, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 91.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 38.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 149.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 126.8%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 104.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.17%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.85%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 70.2%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.1%).