Arapaho vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,857,133 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.356% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 355.8 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $52,074, a difference of 61.0%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $62,857, a difference of 50.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $107,912, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $66,891, a difference of 12.6%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $53,739, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 73.5%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 61.8%), and single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 164.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 141.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 141.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 59.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.3%), family households (66.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.7%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 37.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Australian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 105.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 104.8%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 84.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 40.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.5%).