Arapaho vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,951,322 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.689% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 688.8 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $44,987, a difference of 39.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $102,261, a difference of 34.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $95,560, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $61,270, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,247, a difference of 16.5%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 76.1%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 64.9%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 177.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 143.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 142.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 55.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 5.1%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 75.9%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 66.5%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.5%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.11%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.4%).